1. Overall objective and session logic
Objective: participants understand the differences between lack of conformity with the contract (after 01/01/2023), warranty (voluntary), the right of withdrawal (distance/off-premises purchases), and ADR/mediation, and can write a complete complaint letter, use the right of withdrawal, and plan escalation (Consumer Ombudsman/Trade Inspection).
Logic: rights map → case analysis → letters (3 templates) → escalation paths and evidence → 30‑day plan.
Deliverables: 1) PK1 — Consumer rights map (summary), 2) PK2 — Complaint checklist (lack of conformity), 3) PK3 — Warranty vs lack of conformity (comparison), 4) PK4 — 14‑day withdrawal (form + exemptions), 5) PK5 — Complaint letter (A2–B2 template), 6) PK6 — Withdrawal letter (template), 7) PK7 — Escalation: ombudsman/Trade Inspection/ADR (contacts + steps), 8) PK8 — Evidence pack (what to collect and how), 9) PK9 — 30‑day plan (3 actions), 10) PK‑R — Outcome assessment rubric.
2. Learning outcomes (knowledge • skills • attitudes)
Knowledge: knows the basics of lack of conformity with the contract (after 01/01/2023), understands warranties and their voluntary nature, knows the rules of withdrawal for distance purchases (generally 14 days; exceptions), and understands ADR/mediation and where to seek help (Consumer Ombudsman, Trade Inspection). Skills:
fills in a complete complaint letter (PK5) and a withdrawal form (PK6);
chooses the right path: complaint/warranty/withdrawal/mediation;
collects evidence (PK8) and keeps a deadlines calendar;
prepares a 30‑day plan (PK9). Attitudes: assertiveness, fact-based approach, care for documents, awareness of exceptions.
3. Organisational parameters
Room: U‑shape + 4 tables; 2 flipcharts; projector; timer.
Materials (A4/A3, 1 per person): PK1–PK9, PK‑R; sample terms (fictional), receipts/invoices (anonymous), conversation screenshots (fictional).
Evaluation: Mentimeter PRE/POST (3 questions — section 4) + PK‑R rubric (observation).
4. Mentimeter — questions (PRE and POST)
“I know which path to choose: complaint / warranty / withdrawal.”
“I can write a complaint letter with a full description and a clear request.”
“I know the escalation steps (ombudsman/Inspection/ADR) and what to collect as evidence.”
5. Detailed schedule (180’)
Objective: legal framework without jargon. Instructions: present the objectives and deliverables; ground rules: voluntariness, safety, no disclosure of sellers’ data; we work on examples.
Objective: activate the group’s experience. Instructions: the trainer reads 8 statements (e.g. “Returns in a brick‑and‑mortar store are mandatory” — MYTH; “As a rule, I can withdraw from a distance contract within 14 days” — TRUE; “A warranty is mandatory” — MYTH). Short discussion and reference to PK1.
Objective: clarify “when to use what”. Materials: PK1, PK3, PK4. Instructions (12‑minute mini‑input):
Lack of conformity with the contract (consumer sale after 01/01/2023): priority of repair/replacement, then price reduction/withdrawal — under consumer law.
Warranty — a voluntary commitment by the manufacturer; terms only in the warranty document; it operates alongside lack of conformity.
Withdrawal for distance/off‑premises purchases — generally 14 days to decide; exemptions (e.g. made‑to‑order goods, sealed hygiene items once opened, digital content started with consent and information about losing the right). Exercise (20’): match the correct path + request and deadline to 8 cases (e.g. shoes with a sole coming apart after a week; online license codes; a phone bought online — you simply don’t like it; unpacked headphones). Record on PK1/PK3/PK4.
Objective: write an effective letter. Materials: PK2 (checklist), PK5 (letter template), sample evidence. Instructions:
PK2 — checklist: parties’ details, facts (what/when/where), symptom of non‑conformity, specific request (repair/replacement/price reduction/withdrawal), deadline for completion, legal basis (generally: “consumer law”), attachments (evidence).
PK5 — letter (A2–B2): work in pairs on 2 cases (appliances, clothing). Each person writes max 12 sentences, simple language, no emotions, with a list of attachments.
Cross‑quality check: exchange letters and check against PK2. Criterion: the letter includes a complete request and a deadline.
Objective: step‑by‑step procedure. Materials: PK4 (form + exemptions), PK6 (template). Instructions:
How to count deadlines (generally 14 days from delivery / from signing for services), where to send it, who pays return costs (depending on the terms — if informed, usually the consumer), and refunds by the seller after receiving the goods or proof of return shipment.
Exemptions (discuss the 8 most common).
Exercise (15’): fill in PK6 for the case “shoes bought online — wrong size” and prepare a return label (fictional). Criterion: PK6 is completed in full.
Objective: what next if the seller refuses? Materials: PK7 (contacts and steps), PK8 (evidence). Instructions:
Escalation order: seller → Consumer Ombudsman (free support) → Trade Inspection/ADR (mediation at WIIH; generally 90 days to conclude) → court (last stage).
Payments: if paid by card — report to the bank (chargeback mechanism); if transfer/BLIK — a bank complaint may be possible, but it is not standard chargeback; keep correspondence and report unfair practices to UOKiK when they indicate a broader issue.
PK8 — evidence: order/payment confirmations, correspondence, photos/video of the defect, shipment numbers, terms/offer on the purchase date (screenshot). Exercise (12’): in groups of three, create an escalation map for the case “phone still not working after repair” (request replacement → refusal). Criterion: everyone fills in local contacts in PK7 and writes their escalation plan.
Objective: closure and implementation. Instructions: POST (the same 3 questions). On PK9, write 3 actions for the next 30 days (e.g. “I will organise purchase evidence”, “I will prepare a letter template”, “I will check the return form in 2 stores”).
Instructions: reminder—always read the terms and note deadlines; keep copies of correspondence and confirmations; know where to seek help.
6. Good facilitation practices
Simple language (A2–B2): short sentences, bullet points, no jargon.
Facts > emotions: condition description, dates, order numbers, request and deadline.
Digital safety: don’t send scans of documents to unknown addresses; type links manually only (bridge to scenario 15).
Work on cases: neutral examples, anonymisation.
Bridges: household budget (scen. 14), work in PL (scen. 09), digital (scen. 15).
7. Adaptations, plan B, variants
Language barrier: glossary on cards (PL↔UA); notes allowed; mixed-language pairs.
Small group (≤10): more 1:1 work on letters; phone-call simulations.
Less time (120’): M1 20’, M2 25’, M3 20’, M4 25’; PK9 as homework.
More time (+30’): add a block “Digital services and subscriptions” (withdrawal, automatic renewals).
8. Evaluation and reporting indicators
Mentimeter PRE/POST — 3 questions.
Outputs: PK5 (letters), PK6 (withdrawals), PK7 (contacts), PK8 (evidence list), PK9 (plan).
PK‑R rubric (0–2 pts per criterion, max 10):
Choosing the right path,
Letter quality (PK5),
Correct withdrawal (PK6),
Complete escalation plan (PK7),
Evidence pack (PK8). Interpretation: 0–3 beginner; 4–7 solid; 8–10 ready to act.
9. Printable appendices (ready-to-use content)
10. Branding and compliance (trainer)
On the cards: “Bridges of Hope” logo, EU flag + “Co‑funded by the European Union”, Erasmus+ logo; partners (KIS, Asociația Se Poate).
Space for the project number and the information clause.
11. Trainer checklist (before/after) (trainer)
Before: printouts of PK1–PK9 and cases; Mentimeter; timer; sticky notes. After: photos of outputs (no personal data), saved Mentimeter results, “1 step / 7 days” follow‑up list.
Materials (interactive + printable)
Each card has a button Print and funding markings (hidden on screen in trainer mode, but always present in print).
PK1 — Consumer rights map (summary)
Consumer sale (after 01/01/2023).
Voluntary (per the warranty document). It operates alongside lack of conformity.
As a rule, 14 days to decide (with exceptions).
When the seller refuses / drags the case out.
PK2 — Complaint checklist (lack of conformity)
PK3 — Warranty vs lack of conformity (comparison)
| Criterion | Warranty | Lack of conformity with the contract |
|---|---|---|
| Who is responsible? | ||
| Duration | ||
| Scope | ||
| Order of claims | ||
| Pros/cons |
PK4 — 14‑day withdrawal (form + exemptions)
PK5 — Complaint letter (A2–B2 template)
PK6 — Withdrawal letter (template)
PK7 — Escalation: ombudsman/Trade Inspection/ADR
- Contact the seller + letter (PK5) + evidence (PK8)
- Consumer Ombudsman (free support)
- Trade Inspection / ADR (mediation at WIIH)
- Bank (chargeback) — if paid by card (optional)
- Court (last stage)
| Institution / channel | Contact (phone/website/email) | What I attach | Deadline / note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Ombudsman | |||
| Trade Inspection / ADR (WIIH) | |||
| Bank (chargeback) | |||
| Other |
PK8 — Evidence pack (what to collect)
PK9 — 30‑day plan (3 actions)
| Period | What do I do? | Evidence/outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1–7 | |||
| Day 8–21 | |||
| Day 22–30 |
PK‑R — Outcome assessment rubric
Additional material — Store terms (fictional)
1. Delivery: delivery time 2–5 business days. Delivery cost: 0–25 PLN.
2. Returns (withdrawal): 14 days from delivery. The consumer bears the return cost if informed.
3. Complaints: submit via email or form. Recommended: description, photos, proof of purchase.
4. Digital content: after the service starts with consent and information about loss of the withdrawal right — no 14 days.
5. Contact: support@sklep‑fikcyjny.pl, phone 000‑000‑000.
Additional material — Receipt/Invoice (fictional)
| SALES DOCUMENT (FICTIONAL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Store | Date | ||
| Document no. | Order no. | ||
| Product | Price | ||
| Payment method | Amount | ||
Additional material — Conversation screenshot (fictional)
Consumer: Hello, the headphones from order ORD‑123 stopped working after a week. I would like a replacement.
Store: Only the manufacturer’s warranty. Please send them to service and wait.
Consumer: I am filing a complaint with the seller on the grounds of lack of conformity. Please confirm receipt.
Store: Please don’t write—there’s no point anyway. Only by phone.